|
Post by Ailedhoo on Jan 13, 2014 12:26:43 GMT -8
"Live in our Juruseleam studio..."
So what is your view on the matter?
"The classic debate show which we ask your view! And now; here is our host: Victor Miles!"
Victor Miles goes on the stage.
"Thank you! Thank you! Today we have two guests, one of our sandy realm of UAR and the other from the bowing land of Japan! Takeshi Ruchang, the Prime Minister of Japan himself, is to honour this show with his presence, ready to debate the chemically charged Ali Hassan al-Majid of the UAR!"
Both guests entered the room and sat down.
"Now will get to questions! Before we enter the big issues that connect both Japan and the UAR I will at another big issue; Rhodesia. Is the situation likely to find mending and how best to react to the sad turn of events? Mr al-Majid; in line with UAR policy to the area in terms of peacekeeping what is your view on the matter?"
|
|
|
Post by nedimnapoleon on Jan 13, 2014 12:32:45 GMT -8
The Rhodesian issue is a serious and delicate one. The Rhodesian Government before the crisis has been a friend of the UAR. While only an observer to the African League, the United Arab Republic is willing to assist in organizing a peacekeeping mission to the region, assuming the warring parties consent. We do not wish for destabilization to continue, and we wish for a peaceful solution via diplomatic talks.
|
|
|
Post by Ailedhoo on Jan 13, 2014 12:34:02 GMT -8
"A seeking of diplomatic notions" went Victor Miles. "Now Mr Ruchang: what is your view on the matter of Rhodesia?"
|
|
|
Post by christos200 on Jan 13, 2014 12:38:00 GMT -8
Rhodesia is a very important matter, as it concerns the stability and peace of the entire region. We believe that the solution to the problem should be given by intervention by the African nations. We believe that an international force led by the UN will lead to the peacekeeping mission becoming a neo-imperialist crusade. It is the responsibility of the leading African nations to secure the stability of their region, just as Japan has the responsibility to secure peace and stability in East Asia. So, Japan shall support an intervention by the major African powers in the region.
|
|
|
Post by Ailedhoo on Jan 13, 2014 12:41:21 GMT -8
"I see" went Victor Miles. "With a disagreement already I ask Mr al-Majid on his response to the statement that the UN would lead to peacekeeping becoming neo-imperial?"
|
|
|
Post by nedimnapoleon on Jan 13, 2014 12:49:32 GMT -8
The Neo-imperialist rhetoric is very cheap to say the least. The government of Tokyo has been throwing around words like racist, evil, imperialist without any real justification while our concerns regarding the expansionist policies of Japan are justified. The majority of the population of the UAR is located on the African continent. We are African as much as Japan is Asian. Rhodesia is in our backyard, and we do not wish to see a destabilized and war torn region. Our only aim is to stop the violence and get economic life back, not create puppet governments and occupy areas like "some" governments. We would do nothing without support from the UN itself and the other nations of Africa, with which we have a healthy relationship.
|
|
|
Post by Ailedhoo on Jan 13, 2014 12:50:56 GMT -8
"I see" went Victor. "So Prime Minister; what is your opinion regarding the UAR's justification of its objective and its response to your statement?"
|
|
|
Post by christos200 on Jan 13, 2014 12:57:42 GMT -8
UAR is more of a Middle-Eastern state. North Africa, because of it's Islamic culture and it's Arabic population, can be considered to be part of the Middle East. Rhodesia, on the other hand, is a 'true' African nation in culture and ethnicity, so it would be far better if a 'true' African nation intervenes instead of an Islamic Middle Eastern nation.
Japan has a common culture with Vietnam. There is the Imperial tradition, Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism, the same etiquette, a language that comes from the same route. So, Japan truly has the responsibility to intervene in Vietnam. If Japan does not accept it's responsibility and does not help the East Asian people achieve peace and stability, then how shall it face them? What can the Japanese people say to their brothers? 'We will let your die' or 'We will allow white Europeans reestablish their colonies in Asia'?
Also, UAR uses the UN to establish puppet governments and make aggressive moves against other nations, like Japan, using the mandate of the UN as a justification. Not to say that they self-declare themselves leaders of all UN peacekeeping operations. This makes their use of the UN imperialist.
|
|
|
Post by Ailedhoo on Jan 13, 2014 13:05:45 GMT -8
"Since you spoke of Vietnam" spoke Victor Miles" I think it would best if we talk about that next. Vietnam had founded itself in a tragic case like Rhodesia but the experience had been... more controversial. During the debate between Yergos Verge and Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf the issue of Vietnam was bought up. I will begin hence by asking on what should occur in Vietnam, especially in light of the UN aid worker killings. With both Japan and the UAR accusing each other of imperialism I will begin by asking al-Majid on his view on the matter."
|
|
|
Post by nedimnapoleon on Jan 13, 2014 13:18:32 GMT -8
The UN mission shall continue as it is a humanitarian one, and even though we mourn the lost aid workers, we have a moral responsibility to aid the people of Vietnam. Now regarding the Japanese accusations of imperialism we wish to say that if Japan really cared about a free and independent Vietnam, it would have co-operated with the UN. The UN is an international organization that is under the public eye and thus the government of the UAR has not interior motives in Vietnam other than a moral and humanitarian responsibility. It is not only the UAR that has vowed to help Vietnam but a number of nations, members of the UN. The Empire of Vietnam is clearly a puppet state, and Japans interests in expansion are obvious. All hostility regarding Vietnam has been the result of Japanese policy. The Tonkin incident and Japans withdrawal of Japan from the UN all prove that Japan has motives that do not benefit the people of Vietnam. We would reconcile with the government of Japan but we need them to put out a hand as reconciliation is a two way street. If they are willing, we are willing.
|
|